|
Wall
Street Journal Recognizes New Appraisal
System Bad for Consumers
After
being blamed for helping to inflate
home values during the housing boom,
the appraisal business is again coming
under fire.
Squeezed
by a drop in fees, some appraisers are
compensating by driving long distances
to handle more assignments. Their wanderings
are raising questions about whether
they know enough about the neighborhoods
to accurately assess the value of homes
-- which has implications for both home
buyers and owners.
Bob
Blake, a flight-test engineer who lives
in Palm Beach Gardens, Fla., was shocked
when an appraiser who traveled 44 miles
from Port St. Lucie, Fla., valued his
home at $228,000 in late May. Mr. Blake's
mortgage broker, Skip McDonough, protested
to the appraisal-management company,
Nations Valuation Services Inc., that
the appraiser had failed to look at
comparable homes. Eventually, Nations
sent another appraiser, who valued the
home at $295,000. The dispute delayed
Mr. Blake's refinancing by more than
six weeks.
A
spokesman for Nations Valuation declined
to discuss the details of the appraisals
but said, "We feel we handled it
properly."
Appraisals
are supposed to shield home buyers from
paying too much and lenders from overestimating
the value of collateral. If appraisals
come in too high, buyers may overpay,
making defaults more likely. If they
are too low, it becomes hard to sell
or refinance homes. Many real-estate
agents and builders say that the pendulum
has swung too far toward caution, and
that lowball appraisals threaten to
snuff out any recovery in the housing
market.
In
June, Evie Salazar traveled about 75
miles from her office in Corona, Calif.,
to do an appraisal in Cathedral City,
Calif. Usually, Ms. Salazar says, she
tries to work within about 40 miles
of her home, but business was slow at
the time she accepted that job. "You
do what you've got to do at times to
feed the family and pay the bills,"
she says.
Ms.
Salazar, an appraiser for the past 12
years, says she researched the Cathedral
City market carefully and did a good
job. But many real estate agents and
mortgage brokers charge that some wandering
appraisers are coming up with dubious
estimates. Too many appraisers are getting
assignments in places where they "just
don't know the nuances," says Rick
Turley, who oversees the San Francisco
Bay area for the Coldwell Banker real-estate-brokerage
chain.
The
debate over appraisals is inflamed by
a natural tension: Real-estate agents
and mortgage brokers, who need to complete
transactions to collect their fees,
are unhappy when an appraiser nixes
the sale price. But it also suggests
that there may be unintended consequences
to an attempt by New York Attorney General
Andrew Cuomo to reform the appraisal
business.
Using
the threat of litigation, Mr. Cuomo
last year prodded the government-backed
mortgage investors Fannie Mae and Freddie
Mac into adopting a new code of conduct
for appraisers. Since those two companies
provide funding for the bulk of U.S.
home mortgages, the code, which took
effect May 1, has become the national
standard for most home loans.
The
code bars loan officers, mortgage brokers
or real-estate agents from any role
in selecting appraisers. One result
is that more lenders have outsourced
the selection to appraisal-management
companies, or AMCs, which take a sizable
cut of the appraisal fee, often 40%
or more. The AMCs pay appraisers as
little as $175 to $200 per assignment,
compared with the $350 or more that
many get when they work directly for
a lender.
"Many
appraisers are struggling to survive
on the fees paid by the AMCs,"
says Bill Garber, a spokesman for the
Appraisal Institute, a trade group based
in Chicago. Appraisers are being asked
to work faster even as their fees are
cut, and that conflicts with the goal
of getting reliable appraisals, he says.
Squeezing
Appraisers
Appraisal-management
companies deny they are squeezing appraisers
too hard. A spokesman for banking giant
Wells Fargo & Co., which owns an
AMC, says it "has invested substantial
time and resources in the quality control
of the valuation process to, among other
things, ensure that individual appraisers
have relevant knowledge of the markets
and properties they review." A
spokeswoman for Mr. Cuomo says the new
code is working well and helping protect
appraisers from pressure to inflate
estimates.
Appraisers
are required to follow a set of national
rules known as the Uniform Standards
of Professional Appraisal Practice.
Among other things, those rules require
that "an appraiser preparing an
appraisal in an unfamiliar location
must spend sufficient time to understand
the nuances of the local market."
Yet
some appraisers who travel long distances
to find work may be hard-pressed to
spend "sufficient time" in
an unfamiliar market. LaRon Hall did
an appraisal in early June on a home
being sold in Palm Desert, Calif., about
86 miles from his office in Rancho Cucamonga,
Calif. He says he needs to accept jobs
within a broad swath of Southern California
to earn a living. Under the new appraisal
code, Mr. Hall says, "you're getting
less money and you're having to do more.
... It's definitely a sticky situation."
Mr.
Hall appraised the three-bedroom home
at $186,000, far above the $138,000
for which it sold in late June. Concerned
about accuracy, the mortgage lender
that financed the purchase rejected
Mr. Hall's appraisal and ordered one
from another party before making the
loan, according to a person involved
in the transaction.
A
spokesman for Equifax Inc., whose AMC
unit ordered the appraisal in Palm Desert,
says Mr. Hall has an excellent record
on appraisals and that Equifax has a
"rigorous quality-control process."
Though
consumers can't choose their own appraiser
-- unless they're paying cash for a
home -- they should request a copy of
the appraisal and examine it to see
whether it contains any errors in the
description of the property and whether
the nearby homes, or "comps,"
used to gauge its value are truly comparable.
If they aren't, the consumer should
present any evidence of flaws to the
banks and insist that the appraisal
be reviewed and redone if necessary.
Carol
Kearns, herself a real- estate agent,
complains that an appraisal done on
her own Montvale, N.J., home in June
was "an unprofessional guess."
The appraisal came in at $730,000, which
was more than enough to qualify Ms.
Kearns and her husband, Robert, to refinance
their mortgage. But Ms. Kearns, upset
at what she sees as sloppy work, maintains
that the home is worth more than $900,000.
The
appraiser was Uchenna Eboh, whose employer,
Kobi Group, is about 46 miles away in
Mendham, NJ Ms. Kearns says Mr. Eboh
didn't seem to know her neighborhood
and used dissimilar houses as "comps."
Among those, she says, were two on much
smaller lots and one on a busy street
corner.
'Reasonable
Proximity'
A
colleague of Mr. Eboh says he couldn't
comment and referred questions about
the appraisal to the AMC that ordered
it, Lender Processing Services Inc.'s
LSI unit. A spokeswoman for LPS says
the appraisal "followed the processes
required" by federal standards
and LSI's "more-stringent requirements."
She says LSI "only uses local,
knowledgeable appraisers located within
a reasonable proximity to the properties."
Sometimes
appraisers are called on to express
opinions on the values of faraway homes
without even seeing them. LandSafe,
an appraisal unit of Bank of America
Corp., in May assigned Jane Price, an
appraiser in Dallas, to review another
appraiser's estimate of a home in Cathedral
City, Calif. Ms. Price didn't visit
the neighborhood in question, but her
review cited nearby homes she used to
determine comparable value.
Ms.
Price declined to comment. A spokeswoman
for Bank of America says Ms. Price was
asked to do only a "desktop review"
of the original appraisal. "California
is a state which has a lot of market
information available, which allows
a reviewer to gather credible data about
a property even when they are not in
the immediate area," the spokeswoman
adds.
|